WebMay 24, 2016 · Rabbi Akiva says: “Even if he found another fairer than she”, for it is written, “And it shall be if she finds no favour in his eyes” (Deut. 24:1). Mishnah Gittin 9.10 [5] The School of Shammai rightly focused on the … WebBeit Shammai suggest that a man may divorce his wife only if she has committed a sexual transgression, apparently adultery: ... Rabbi Akiva (לא תמצא חן בעיניו) Rabbi Akiva takes the most “lenient” position—from the husband’s perspective—declaring that a man may divorce his wife for essentially no reason at all:
When to Get Divorced - Chabad.org
WebShammai, the strict constructionist of biblical law, maintained that the scriptural words ervat davar [meaning “some fault or indecency,” which was the standard biblical grounds for … WebSep 10, 2012 · Thus we reach Jesus’ teaching in Matthew, who chooses Shammai in the debate: I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for marital unfaithfulness, and marries another woman commits adultery. –Matthew 19:9. It’s curious that only Matthew includes this exception about infidelity. It doesn’t exist in Mark, the text that Matthew ... boxster history
Jesus’ Dealings With Lepers Divorce in the Bible - JW.ORG
WebMay 21, 2024 · SHAMMAI. SHAMMAI (Ha-Zaken, i.e.,The Elder; c. 50 b.c.e.–c. 30 c.e.), one of the *Zugot, the leaders of the Sanhedrin.Hillel's first colleague was *Menahem the Essene and Shammai was appointed to succeed him as *av bet din when he retired. Nothing is known of the early life of Shammai except for the statement that he was a builder by … WebSo, when the Pharisees ask Jesus if it is lawful for a man to divorce his wife, they are asking which rabbi, Shammai or Hillel, Jesus follows. But they are also testing Jesus to see if He will take the same line as John the Baptist who was killed for his condemnation of Antipas' and Herodias' unlawful divorces and remarriage (Mark 6:14–29), while they sit in the same … WebSep 9, 2024 · In the Mishnaic period the theory of the law that the husband could divorce his wife at will was challenged by the school of Shammai. It interpreted the text of Deut. xxiv. 1 in such amanner as to reach the conclusion that the husband could not divorce his wife except for cause, and that the cause must be sexual immorality (Git. ix. 10; Yer. guthrie\\u0027s attalla