Pratibha processors vs. union of india
Web15. Coming to the merits of the case, I am inclined to hold that the issue on merits is fully covered in favour of petitioner by the decision of Supreme Court rendered in the case of … WebIn this context, we may take the liberty to reproduce certain portion of the order passed by a concurrent Bench of this Tribunal in OA No. 4103/2011 - Shri Laxmi Dutt Kaushik vs. Union of India decided on 12.12.2012 :- It is well settled law that beneficial schemes started by the Union of India or a State Government as a model employer, like the ACP Scheme, or its …
Pratibha processors vs. union of india
Did you know?
WebMar 28, 2000 · In the case of Pratibha Processors (supra) the warehousing period had come to an end on 3rd March, 1991 and on or about 9th May, 1991, the importer had filed bill of … WebAug 25, 2024 · In fact, the Madras High Court in the case of Refex Industries v. Assistant Commissioner [6] held that once sufficient ITC is available, then no interest can be …
WebM/s. SBEC Sugar Limited & ANR. Vs. Union of India & Ors. D.K. JAIN, J.: 1. These appeals, by grant of leave, are directed against the judgments and orders dated 3rd April, 2006 … WebSupriyo a.k.a Supriya Chakraborty & Abhay Dang v. Union of India thr. Its Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice & other connected cases (2024) are landmark cases of the Supreme …
WebThe Union of India Through the Secretary Ministry of Law and Justice Shastri Bhavan New Delhi 110001 …Respondents WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 32 OF THE CONSTITUTION … WebTax Management India. Com Law and Practice : Digital eBook Research is most exciting & rewarding Share: ... He relied on the following decisions:- (a) Union of India Vs. Ind-Swift …
WebJun 12, 2024 · In the landmark judgement of Pratibha Processors v. Union of India 1996 taxmann.com 72 (SC), an essential principal was laid down related to collection of …
WebUNION OF INDIA Vs PRATIBHA BONNERJEA. 21 November 1995 Supreme Court Download. UNION OF INDIA Vs PRATIBHA BONNERJEA Bench: AHMADI A.M. (CJ) Case number: … natural skincare with tanyaWebSUPREME COURT OF INDIA K.S.Paripoornan : S.P.Bharucha Pratibha Processors Versus Union Of India Case No. : . Date of Decision : 10/11/96 Advocates Appeared: Arora … marilyn women\u0027s basketball scheduleWebFor the period between 3rd March, 1989 and 16th February, 1992 she served as the ViceChairman and was entitled to pension. She contended that her pension should be … marilyn worden owasso okWebCase cited in: 22 cases Judgment: Aftab Alam, J. Just a few weeks ago in Union of India v. Rajasthan Spinning & Weaving Mills Appeal arising from SLP (C) No. 15927 of 2007 we had the occasion to examine the nature and scope of the penalty provision in the Central Excise Act as contained in Section 11AC, one of the four sections, forming a quartet, concerning … natural skin chickWebPRATIBHA PROCESSORS Vs. UNION OF INDIA. LAWS(SC)-1996-10-1 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: BOMBAY) Decided on October 11,1996 PRATIBHA PROCESSORS … marilyn women\\u0027s basketballWebIn Pratibha Processors v. Union of India, AIR 1997 SC 138, the apex Court observed that penalty is ordinarily levied on an assessee for some contumacious conduct or for a deliberate violation of the provisions of the particular statute. 19. In Associated Cement Co. Ltd. v. Commercial Tax Officer, (1981) ... marilyn wyatt facebookWebPratibha Processors Vs. Union of India- 1996 (88) ELT 12 (S.C) 3. Shri G. Kirupanandan, Learned Superintendent (Authorized Representative) appearing on behalf of the revenue reiterates the finding of the impugned order. He placed reliance on the following judgments: Commissioner of Central Excise, Bengaluru Vs. Srikumar Agencies- natural skin care wholesale vendors