Burford v ssclg 2017 ewhc 1493 admin
WebBurford v SSCLG [2024] EWHC 1493 (Admin) judgement endorsed the view that curtilage is an area of land ‘attached to’ a house and ‘forming one enclosure with it’. In Lowe v … WebSouth Buckinghamshire DC v SSETR & Gregory (QBD 11.11.98 CO/2291/98) Oxford CC v SSCLG & One Folly Bridge Ltd [2007] EWHC 769 (Admin) R (oao Perrett) v SSCLG & …
Burford v ssclg 2017 ewhc 1493 admin
Did you know?
WebNov 7, 2002 · Burford Capital Ltd v London Stock Exchange Group Plc [2024] EWHC 1183 (Comm) (15 May 2024) Burford v Secretary of State for Communities and Local … WebChallenge Fencing Limited v SSHCLG & Elmbridge BC [2024] EWHC 553 (Admin) confirms that the extent of the curtilage of a building is a question of fact and degree, and a matter …
Web• R(DSD) v Parole Board [2024] EWHC 694 (Admin) at [141] – The distinction between relevant considerations, properly so called, and matters which may be so obviously material in any particular case that they cannot be ignored, is not merely one of legal classification; it has important consequences. If a consideration arises as a matter of Web(3) goodman logistics v ssclg [2024] ewhc 947 (admin) •strategic rail freight interchange in green belt •application of turner and samuel smith •visual impact was an obviously …
WebJun 15, 2001 · Superior Composite Structures LLC v Malcolm Parrish [2015] EWHC 3688 (Admin) (21 December 2015) Superior Import / Export Ltd & Ors, R (On the Application Of) v Revenue And Customs & Anor [2024] EWHC 3172 (Admin) (11 December 2024) Super-Max Offshore Holdings & Anor v Malhotra [2024] EWHC 1130 (Comm) (06 May 2024) WebChallenge Fencing Limited v SSHCLG & Elmbridge BC [2024] EWHC 553 (Admin) confirms that the extent of the curtilage of a building is a question of fact and degree, and a matter for the decision maker and Burford v SSCLG & Another [2024] EWHC 1493 (Admin) sets out three factors to be taken into
Web3 Burford v SSCLG & Test Valley BC [2024] EWHC 1493 (Admin) 4 Sinclair-Lockhart’s Trustees v Central Land Board [1950] 1 P&CR 195 5 Methuen-Campbell v Walters [1979] 1 QB 525 6 HM Attorney-General ex rel Sutcliffe & Rouse & Hughes v Calderdale BC [1983] JPL 310 7 Skerritts of Nottingham Ltd v SSETR (No. 1) [2000] EWCA Civ 60, [2001] JPL …
WebAdrian Burford v SSCLG and Test Valley BC [2024] EWHC 1493 (Admin) reaffirmed the criteria laid down in Sutcliffe v Calderdale BC [1982] 46 P &CR 399 for identifying … the cherokee 8a group incWeb•Shirley v SSCLG [2024] EWHC 2306 (Admin) •Wealden DC v SSCLG [2024] EWHC 351 (Admin) 01/08/2024 2 Context •Nitrogen (N) essential for plant growth •78% of atmosphere = N, but inert and not available to most plans as a nutrient •“Nutrient”N = forms of N that are available to plants: –nitrogen dioxide (NO 2) the cherokee ledger newspaperWebAppearing successfully for the council to resist a challenge to the dismissal of an appeal in a case which summarises the law on residential curtilage: Burford v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2024] EWHC 1493 (Admin). the cherokee group llcWebMar 10, 2024 · The appellant appealed against both decisions, contending that there had been no breach of listed building control because the items were not buildings, that the … tax deductions miningWebJun 15, 2001 · Superior Composite Structures LLC v Malcolm Parrish [2015] EWHC 3688 (Admin) (21 December 2015) Superior Import / Export Ltd & Ors, R (On the Application … tax deductions married vs singleWebJan 1, 2024 · That was the issue in Dorothy Bohm v SSCLG [2024] EWHC 3217 (Admin), a challenge to an Inspector’s decision to grant planning permission for the demolition and rebuilding of a dwelling house in the Hampstead Conservation Area in London. Although not a listed building, the existing dwelling (which would be lost in its entirety) made a positive ... tax deductions medical billsWebSep 5, 2024 · The case of Baroness Cumberlege of Newick v SSCLG [2024] EWHC 2057 (Admin) was an appeal against Sajid Javid’s approval of a scheme that had previously been refused by the local authority. It led to criticism as the Inspector had deemed the authority’s planning policy to be out of date for the purposes of the NPPF’s tilted balance. the cherokee creation story